"Oi I said that already. "
I merely report ...
i'm wondering how they feel about their likeness being spammed all over the internet right now?
i'll bet they didn't sign up for this kind of attention.. it reminds me of an article wired magazine did on youtube a couple years ago about people that had their careers or social life ruined by a viral youtube video.. anyway, it would be interesting to find out who these guys are and what may or may not end up happening with them over this..
"Oi I said that already. "
I merely report ...
i'm wondering how they feel about their likeness being spammed all over the internet right now?
i'll bet they didn't sign up for this kind of attention.. it reminds me of an article wired magazine did on youtube a couple years ago about people that had their careers or social life ruined by a viral youtube video.. anyway, it would be interesting to find out who these guys are and what may or may not end up happening with them over this..
I showed the video to some members of my family (never were JWs or had any contact with JWs). Their reactions:
1. Laughter
2. The dark-haired bloke looks like Ed Milliband (I think he looks like the guy from 'Friends')
3. It couldn't possibly be an OFFICIAL JW publication, it must be someone taking the pee - no religious group would publish this, would they?
4. Do they REALLY teach this?
5. Is this REALLY taught to JW children?
Suffice to say that there will be some interesting conversations (rather than the usual polite 'not interested - go away') if and when JWs call at their doors!
i was trying to think of all the many many people i've ever met and conculded that none of them could be termed "normal".
some of them might have seemed normal to start with but on further inspection most definatly not!.
in answer to the obvious question no i do not think i'm normal neither, i don't think i would want to be either.
Yes, there is.
I'm normal.
I'm just not sure about the rest of you here!
this advert appears every time i click on the active topics link.
please make it stop.... .
I use firefox and have installed 'adblocker'.
I used to get these ads and they depressed me, to be honest. I am a single man of a certain age but the thought that I might be attracted to some of these horrors (I'm sure that they are nice people in real life) made me shudder.
If I thought that the only 'opportunities' open to me were similar to some of the 'opportunities' represented here I'd give up now!
i seem to remember somebody saying that since the 90's the number of elders has declined from 90000 to 60000. does anybody have any hard figures regarding this?.
the organization is desperate for "qualified" men.
but their standards are much too high, especially the monthly field service hour requirements tagged on to endless meetings and congregational busywork.
I haven't read the whole thread (and I never was a JW) so apologies if this has been mentioned.
Apart from the obvious (power, ego, 'big fish in a little pond') I can't see any reason why anyone would consent to serve in a position of responsibility.
They may have liability in child abuse cases, of course, as has so well been demonstrated recently. And the 'Menlo Park' fiasco. But I'm fairly sure that as access to information continues to increase exponentially there will be other liabilities. One that springs to mind is 'Data Protection' legislation and its equivalents in various countries. KHs keep vast amounts of personal information, and the keeping and use of this is regulated. Plenty of opportunities for civil and criminal liability.
I think I've read on various posts that WTBTS in its various guises is distancing itself from local congregations - in that local congregations are to be seen as separate legal entities from WTBTS itself. That could lead to personal liability for elders/trustees. (This is a complicated legal issue and varies by jurisdiction, but the concept of 'personal liability' seems to be increasing in most jurisdictions).
Even if I WAS a JW, and 'qualified' I would be very, very, wary.
so there was this great gang of us, from south london, manchester and wolverhampton, went to socialise with a group in fishguard in wales.. amongst the conversations one of the single sisters stated, "i could never marry anybody who used to be in the world".. i guess a lifetime of knocking on doors had given her the impression there couldnt possibly be a convert in her midst, never mind later alone with her in her mgb.. so whats with this, did you think we had rat scabies or were possesed by demons or something?.
.
.
Nambo: I live only 15 miles from there. We could have had a beer!
[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:officedocumentsettings> <o:allowpng /> </o:officedocumentsettings> </xml><!
[endif][if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:worddocument> <w:view>normal</w:view> <w:zoom>0</w:zoom> <w:trackmoves /> <w:trackformatting /> <w:punctuationkerning /> <w:validateagainstschemas /> <w:saveifxmlinvalid>false</w:saveifxmlinvalid> <w:ignoremixedcontent>false</w:ignoremixedcontent> <w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext>false</w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext> <w:donotpromoteqf /> <w:lidthemeother>en-us</w:lidthemeother> <w:lidthemeasian>x-none</w:lidthemeasian> <w:lidthemecomplexscript>x-none</w:lidthemecomplexscript> <w:compatibility> <w:breakwrappedtables /> <w:snaptogridincell /> <w:wraptextwithpunct /> <w:useasianbreakrules /> <w:dontgrowautofit /> <w:splitpgbreakandparamark /> <w:enableopentypekerning /> <w:dontflipmirrorindents /> <w:overridetablestylehps /> </w:compatibility> <m:mathpr> <m:mathfont m:val="cambria math" /> <m:brkbin m:val="before" /> <m:brkbinsub m:val="--" /> <m:smallfrac m:val="off" /> <m:dispdef /> <m:lmargin m:val="0" /> <m:rmargin m:val="0" /> <m:defjc m:val="centergroup" /> <m:wrapindent m:val="1440" /> <m:intlim m:val="subsup" /> <m:narylim m:val="undovr" /> </m:mathpr></w:worddocument> </xml><!
[endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* style definitions */ table.msonormaltable {mso-style-name:"table normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0in; mso-para-margin-right:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0in; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"century schoolbook","serif";} </style> <![endif].
This is where dubs miss out.
I am an atheist, but I love this hymn: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=b5mqR-ehY9s
(ETA: and this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5NOVcefEYU)
i just saw this news story.. i never was a jw (or a catholic) but i liked this story:.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-19451439.
can you imagine a gb member ever saying in effect - 'we were wrong'?.
Earnest: Thanks for that. I think that maybe posters here who read that story may ask the same question as I did in the title of this thread.
i just saw this news story.. i never was a jw (or a catholic) but i liked this story:.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-19451439.
can you imagine a gb member ever saying in effect - 'we were wrong'?.
Sorry, I didn't make this clear. This news story is about a senior RC cardinal (considered maybe a candidate for pope) who seems to have made various statements admitting that the RC church was wrong about various issues.
(I can't make it 'clickable' - can anyone help?)
i just saw this news story.. i never was a jw (or a catholic) but i liked this story:.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-19451439.
can you imagine a gb member ever saying in effect - 'we were wrong'?.
I just saw this news story.
I never was a JW (or a catholic) but I liked this story:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-19451439
Can you imagine a GB member ever saying in effect - 'we were wrong'?
(Sorry, don't know how to make it clickable).